Hello!
Perhaps when reading news on the Law of Science have you stopped to think, "Well, if you will now have contracts for all and stabilization, and do not know why, since then, and do not have to go the peanuts, I'd rather stay at home ... "
Therefore, we remind you why, more than ever, we need this event:
- First, what has made the Government is just a draft, nothing prevents rewriting everything tomorrow. In fact, with the Research Staff in Training, the PSOE FJI introduced him to the draft and, less than a week later, adopted a totally different.
- Secondly, the draft Law on Science will be debated in Parliament, where it can be changed from top to bottom. Only if the government and political parties see that there is a strong scientific community and decisively together to claim their rights and assert that "research is the future ", will adopt a satisfactory Science Act.
- Thirdly, the Law of Science is nothing without FUNDING. If the Central Government and the Autonomous Ia cut in investment in R + D + i, what serves the law? of what value to recognize the right to move if your school has no money to go to conferences? what good is that reformulate the research staff if there is no money to provide places?
- And finally, hopefully all the problems in the R + D + i to be resolved with the Law of Science, which has nothing to say
- Delays in the resolution of calls (which may exceed 6 months)
- Lack of a coordinated calendar of aid.
- English GDP spent on R + D + i is less than half that of Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Finland, ...
- Thousands of researchers (fellows associated with projects) no contract, no social security, without the right to strike ... Fraud
- contracts and lack of a transparent system of selection
- Science policy based on "concrete" and then not have equipment that researchers who use ... Weight
- increasing appropriations as a funding mechanism
- Lack of a Covenant of State "to ensure a stable science policy and multi-year perspective
0 comments:
Post a Comment